I think you overstate the seriousness of the problem. Great video, it should be mandatory viewing. Movies usually look better in wide screen displays because movies are filmed in such an aspect ratio. 2.Widescreen is better for viewing movies than full screen. I used to hate widescreen, but now I often won’t watch a movie on TV or on my computer if it is in pan and scan because it is really disorienting and looks terrible. Sure, you’re butchering the composition and I agree films should be presented in their intended aspect ratio, but the quality is not diminished by presenting a widescreen film in 4:3. Hollywood here I come! Otherwise, I’m indifferent as to whether they crop tops and bottoms for high def presentations, or not. I’ve been watching CHiPs and Fantasy Island where they have converted them into 16×9. To fix the issue, you can try to check the full screen settings of your games, which is the easiest method. 791 views. At-least its better than the VHS days where 2:35:1 films where cut in half. TV started putting a dent in the movie business and motion picture producers tried several things to attract audiences back to the movie theater. Just think about it. Seems to be more to do with the fact that this conversion has more in common with the crude crop you mentioned. After switching to an ultrawide monitor and comparing ultrawide vs. dual monitor setups, here’s what we noticed: Extended Screen Real Estate on One Screen. Having said that TV has become more cinematic over recent times and I think 16:9 works especially well for nature documentaries where you often want to show off the full extent of the landscape. Ultrawide Monitors. I still prefer my 20.1″ 4:3 (1600×1200) monitor for office work though. Finally, the price of wide-screen 20" monitors is still higher than for 5:4 displays. Your email address will not be published. I’ve always had a sense that widescreen is better than full screen. If 16:9 is the new standard, then just stick to it; otherwise, it’s really annoying. Puoi modificare le tue preferenze in qualsiasi momento in Le tue impostazioni per la privacy. It’s just wrong. Maybe this would be better using a different example. Show me one 20.1″ widescreen monitor that has 1200 pixels vertically? The movie is what you focus on and it is filmed in a certain shape. A 1.85 movie will show very small black bars at the top and bottom unless the tv has alot of overscan. The widescreen format is all a fraud, it is only sales strategy… This format appeared in films by the need for film producers to compete with television, it really such a long recording there, it really does is crop the image up and down or using a rectangular template on the lens camera to record the movie. wait a minute. I’ve been watching in HD 16:9 on a 65” and assumed it was the TV size giving everyone close ups. Now if we make a tv to fit a 2:35:1 aspect ratio to get rid of the big black bars, then the movies shot on 1:85:1 (and theres alot of them) would have thick black bars side to side. Just my.02 though. talk about getting the exact video that i was looking for when i typed “seinfeld 16:9 vs 4:3” thanks!! This site might help you visualize the differences. I’m a bit dissapointed that they did not add much space on the edges, as some of the shoots feel cramped. It allows the director to make a more pleasing 4:3 version in theory BUT you do get dead space, often at the bottom, AND it sometimes introduces mistakes. Nice and informative. The old CRT TVs are an example of the full screen format with its square screen. While dual monitors are one way of extending your screen space, one of the major downfalls has always been the gap between the two monitors, also known as the bezel gap. To be fair it doesn’t look too bad but personally i think the original intended ratio should be preserved. Or your choice of the color. I was wondering how much information was lost when moving to 16:9, I was wondering why Star Trek wasn’t remastered in a similar matter before watching this. At the end of the day, I’d rather watch the 1/33 ratio version. What will that be, like 2880×2160? 0:24. Well, the other day, I played Super Smash Bros. Melee (a 4:3 nintendo Gamecube videogame) and all my friends there were like “EWWW, BLACK BARS!”, “FILL THE SCREEN”, and I am just like: “You guys retarded? absolutely love this documentary I have showed it to many people who don’t believe widescreen is better. It’d be better to have cropped it to only 14:9 and get a slightly wider image and a small pillar boxing. @Struckworld My Fullscreen film’s don’t have black bar’s,on my widescreen TV,and I don’t have to toy with my aspect ratio,on the TV remote to get rid of them,and if they cut of a little,I wouldn’t care,they can pan left,and right I still wouldn’t care,again I think anamorphic widescreen should be banned,matte is not too bad,and people nowaday’s are to lazy to make Fullscreen movies,matte screen’s the best we get,and widescreen TV’s suck the width should match the heighth,as much as possable. LCD panel manufacturers can save a lot of money if they use the same parts for both computer monitors and HDTVs. Dwight Pavlovic | September 1, 2018. I’m sick right. Dual Screen. Couldn’t Warner Home Video use the Full Screen version only on Super 35 releases, rather than using both the Widescreen and the Full Screen versions? Informazioni su dispositivo e connessione Internet, incluso l'indirizzo IP, Attività di navigazione e di ricerca durante l'utilizzo dei siti web e delle app di Verizon Media. Not yet reviewed. :-), @cloudvol7 well the black bars don’t actually cover up the picture, you see the picture isn’t tall enough to fit the TV so they use black bars to fill in the empty space, I first saw Seinfeld in Widescreen, this video shows I made a big mistake. this shot in 1.85:1 would have probably been perfect. @cloudvol7 because ALL widescreen TVs have a 16:9 ratio, in widescreen thats 1:78:1, most films are filmed at a 1:78:1 or higher. For the average viewer, who just wants a laugh after a hard day at work, either aspect ratio will do fine the average consumer isn’t concerned with the minutiae that die-hard Seinfeld fans are. I’ve even re-purchased movies that I have in Fullscreen. I have an idea to solve everyones problems. But that’s all right. Follow That man knows how to use the geometry of the widescreen frame. So you’re perfectly OK with having the sides chopped off of a widescreen movie, right? Fucking hollywood being cheap on us! Does ultrawide or dual monitor feature G-Sync or Freesync . Wow… I have watched 8 seasons of Seinfeld on prime video. You don’t mind paying “a bunch of money” for DVDs and only getting 33% of the original image, yes? The widescreen version looks like it was cropped and poorly framed in comparison. So the remastering is done for each and every single frame moving the 16:9 frame up or down the 35mm film with the needs of the scene? Same with Get TV,you oughta see it YUCK! You lose content AND definition in fullscreen. I would usually say 2.4:1 (or 2.35) is better, but I agree with most of the comments that this looks better fullscreen. When did home video in widescreen become the norm instead of the exception? The fundamental problem with Widescreen 2.35:1 on a 16:9 HDTV is that about one-third of the pixels are not being used. But I do love hi-def image as the original broadcasting always looked dated and unrefined. But, when the TV channels do this, they do not Zoom based on a “centered” image. Im worried about the extra horsepower that my video card will need to spit out, is there much difference between the 1440 x 900 that the widescreen spits out vs. the 1280 x 1084 of the widescreen? So it’s a mixed feeling. I just didn’t know why until now when I just watched this video. 3.Widescreen movies can still be played in full screen TVs and vice versa. 16:9 needs to be the standard for movies at a theater and in the home. go to widescreenadvocate.org to check out some examples. This often causes text to not be seen or certain important points in the movie to not be seen. I think the Harry Potter films were shot using the same lenses as the Matrix films. At first I thought Seinfeld was just feeling different, because I only had been watching it on DVD with the 4:3 black pillars. Generally, the movie is originally shot in widescreen, and then cropped to fullscreen. In a theater when you have a HUGE screen, this is okay. Who cares if there are Black bars at the top & bottom of the screen. a widescreen vs. a square monitor. I’m really glad they shoot hardly ANYTHING in CINEMA SCOPE anymore though since that is just way too WIDE for me personally since it comes in RIDICULOUSLY small on an old 4:3 and even small on modern day TV’s that are 16:9 and would still come in small on the next gen TV’s where they want to make them 21:9 which is what MOST of the JAMES BOND Movies and ALLOT of Other movies are shot in to. 11 years ago. Sure, the scope of the movie is much better, but there isn’t a particular lot to look at. The Choice is clear, WIDESCREEN is the only way to go. With a widescreen TV and a full screen DVD or streaming video you still get to view pretty much everything, with very little being cut off.If someday, my Xtoriez anthology gets turned into a movie, I will take it to the extreme. 2.Widescreen is better for viewing movies than full screen. Now a days All DVDs are in one Widescreen format or another. I haven’t seen fullscreen along the top of a dvd cover in years. If I get a fullscreen movie, even as a gift, or if there was some mix up with the company I ordered the movie from, I won’t even go near the movie until I can trade it for widescreen. When you use your HDTV or Blu-ray player to “Zoom,” it does so based on a “centered” image…. I absolutely Love WIDESCREEN Movies. But for the Matrix, since it was spherical, the 4:3 DVD had the full-frame original image, and the widescreen DVD had the tops and bottoms cut off, meaning if you had the widescreen DVD, you were loosing part of the picture. If the DVD says it is ‘widescreen’ then: A 1.78 movie will fill the screen completely. Because it was filmed in Super 35, you still see both, but the edge of the screen is a lot closer to them, and there’s a lot more background above and below them. What annoys me is back in the 90s when a lot of films were shot with 4:3 camera, the blu ray versions are remastered and released at WIDESCREEN? $134.99 Your price for this item is $134.99. In fact, I have the widest screen that you can buy, and I still can’t avoid the black bars on top and bottom! FOX airs their programing letterboxed. Used to make me laugh. While it may fit without cropping, what about the wasted screen real-estate? I would rather watch the show the way the directors framed it. I saw Ben-Hur on a video cassette a few years before seeing this. I hate when they did this to the 4 Peanuts movies on dvd from the 70’s to the 80’s. I love HD and 16:9, but if you ever have to lose content to achieve that ratio, it just can’t be done. Your typical HDTV out there is 16:9 or 1.78:1. They should not crop things. I never new what that was until I brought the DvD version and found out that the film was alot wider than I expected. I’ve never watched it in fullscreen, but I expected it to just be cropped from 16:9 to 4:3. This is well known with the Terminator films and the Back to the Future films, which both look better in 4:3. Ninety-nine percent of the televisions that you buy today are not square anymore. The first one is “pan and scan,” while the second is widescreen. All Right Reserved. The latter is considered as 5K ultrawide (and 5K2K or … To clarify, the episodes released and shown in 16:9 are not cropped. Even when shooting Super35, everything on the WIDESCREEN version is what they INTENDED you to see. Look at how most of what is seen on the left and right, which is cropped off, ends up showing more detail because of the zoom. No, the black bars take up the empty space on the screen, fullscreen cuts off half the picture. @a2Wanderer “A ‘correct’ 4:3 version has way much more information at the top & bottom, than is shown in the widescreen version.”. Is this even an issue anymore? Currently, masked widescreen is the predominant format for theatrical films. Preach it! Does a disservice to the creators of the program and looks terrible. That’s happening now, and American Movie Classics often shows widescreen films letterboxed; in about five years the TV screen’s gonna get wider anyway. Now, I feel confident enough to say that widescreen is in fact better than full screen. not in this case, if the director didn’t compensate for what would be done in p&s then full-screen would suck. Widescreen is wider. That's cool. You could talk til you’re blue in the face and never make a dent with them, and the same for movies. Watching Seinfeld right now on iTunes in 1080p resolution. Thanks Scorsese!:D. Full screen is better. The original Super 35 negative was full-frame and the top and bottom were cut off to get the 2.35:1 aspect ratio, not the other way around. Will movie studio will make a 3:56 aspect ratio feature in the future? Some scenes just… I couldnt explain it at that moment but it just felt weird (I’ve watched the original 4:3 episodes on TV before, and this time I watched it on Netflix. Who’s in charge of the active format description (AFD) for those channels? Why not keep it 4:3 and add PNS info for 16:9 then? I’m the kinda fella who usually doesn’t give a hoot about a “creator’s vision” if the finished product is still engaging (which is a personal thing, obviously). If you can find a 1920x1200 widescreen monitor at around 26" diagonal that would be a sweet gaming monitor, and cheaper than my Dell 3008WFP. Ultrawide Monitor vs Dual Monitors . I’m ashamed to admit that there was a point in my life where I consistently opted for Fullscreen releases. level 2. When TV came along, it adopted that same format. I depends on the movie whether it is the sides being restored to make widescreen, or the tops being chopped to make widescreen. I saw this mentioned on the wikipedia and wanted more details and your video has blown me away. You do see 16:10 for PCs, because on lower resolution screens, there were too few vertical pixels, and the task bar to also take into account. On this video there was nothing in the far edges that was important so your comment made sense. Widescreen may be good for movies, but what good does it make when most movies have aspect ratio of 2:35. If it was originally released in 1.33:1, then I’ll watch it that way. Someone please correct me if I’m wrong, but what Scorsese says at 3:24 sounds like total nonsense. I’ve seen several films and videos in widescreen and I have always found with many faces and objects cut from above and below. The main difference between the two is the aspect ratio that they use. I hate that Seinfeld is 16:9 on Hulu, especially when I use a crt that would be perfect for the original 4:3. In this type of set up, all 2.35 films are shown in full-frame super widescreen with no black bars. A 2.0 or 2.35 movie will have large black bars at the top and bottom because 2.35:1 is much. Comparing Widescreen and Fullscreen ©Turner Classic Movies. If I go to someones house and see that they are using the stretch feature on their TV while watching shows that were originally in 4:3 I let loose with an abusive tirade……they then realize they deserved it when they correct their error. Name ANY TV show made before 2000-2005, and it has been cropped, either for Blu-Ray DVD, or when playing on many TV networks. Unless you pay attention, you might be going out to buy the Widescreen version. This video kind of shows a reverse effect, the director knew that the video would become panned and scanned so he kept all the action in the middle. just a video to show you the difference between widescreen and fullscreen using footage from the film matrix.. Video taken from the channel: Johnathan Bond. New generations aren’t going to know what they’ve missed. Just shoot in 16:9 or give us TVs that display correctly!!!! Acer B7 23.8" Widescreen Monitor Display Full HD (1920x1080) 4 ms GTG 16:9 75 Hz. I don’t know anything about cinematography, but every time I see one of these dumb widescreen cropped versions of old stuff I just can perceive that something is missing in the shot and that it looks weird, even if I don’t know the original. 6. If it was originally 1.78:1, I’ll watch it that way. Great and informative video about aspect ratio and intented framing. It’s the most retarted thing ever because it cuts out soooo much information. Now all the shots look claustrophobic to me. It wasn’t 16:9 and then chopped down to 4:3. There are tons of titles that are way better to watch in Full Screen that not only do not lose information on the left and right but add a lot of details on top and bottom. Plus, it cut off most of the beautiful scenery. on standard definition tvs, Stations like CBS ABC NBC CW & WGN air their shows cropped with no scanning. Confirm the settings. They also did this on The Simpsons, but the few seasons they released on Blu-ray are 4:3, but the black bars are part of the actual frame, I believe because of the BD standard not allowing 4:3? What gives? The thing that gets me is that at first we all had 4:3 screens. I compared the dvd version of friends and blu Ray version and noticed that it was remastered in 16:9 in a different way as a saw the tiniest bits would be cropped from the top and bottom so friends did a better job with remastering. I found it to be annoying.Very informative video. I noticed in a lot of movies directors knew their movies were going to be cropped so they focused a lot of the action in the center and left a lot of dead space on the sides of the original theatrical versions of films. Movies used to be filmed in a 4:3 format. They are wide screen. I didn't know that Pixar did the re-rendering process to make their full-screen better. Dual screen setups are exactly what it … Ironically, parts of this get windowboxed through pillarboxed letterboxed video on modern displays… which is something that should be avoided nearly as much as pan and scan. I want to buy the fullscreen version. Save $5. That film has excellent usage of an anamorphic 2.35:1 format. @Zaranyzerak Oh you did say you were done,my bad…Anyway’s you insulted me too,hell you just did in you’r comment,and I didn’t insult you that much anyway’s.That’s why I was surprised you blocked me,but I will say the conversation was getting pretty old anyway’s,although I do wish they’d do something about those Black bar’s,because they really suck.Especially,the cinescope one’s,they’re huge,with the bar’s gone there won’t be much to complain about…. Widescreen. I’m sick of buying new TVs only to have wasted screen space because the director decided that the old aspect ratio isn’t good enough any more. (36mmx24mm) Significantly wider than 4:3 and only slightly narrower than HDTV…AND in addition, the picture quality improvement achieved in this HD adaptation process – all in all a job superbly well done…in fact, almost “miraculously” well done!Seinfeld is shown on Channel 13 every night here in the Los Angeles region – in glorious HD…. It just feels wrong.I wish TV producers were a bit more brave than not at all and had the guts to normalize black bars and pillars instead of pandering to this kind of stupidity.They did it for films on TV, but now they keep “updating” old TV material for widescreen. Joss Whedon has been very vocal on why his show SHOULD NEVER be watched in 16:9. He claims that when you cut off the sides of a movie you have to blow up the image in order to fill the frame, which produces a more fuzzy picture. I strongly doubt if/when Seinfeld comes to Blu Ray, they’ll spend the time/money to remaster for both aspect ratios, and the general public will have forgotten about (or never knew of) the original 4:3 broadcast versions. SKU: 6439326. Don’t EVER try to explain this to my parents, they have ZERO idea of this. One huge flaw of ultrawide monitors: You generally can't use multiple apps in full-screen mode. Too bad the only way to watch the full screen version is to buy the VHS or the full screen DVD, which are both very rare. Hopefully they will choose 4:3 this time. The one type of shots that doesn’t work well, though, is when you get those extreme quick zoom ins, which some old TV shows might use for dramatic effect. Add to Cart. Great video. Also, widescreen is always clearer in detail because the transmission is not stretched to fill a square screen. 16:9 is just one aspect ratio, you also have 2.85:1 or 2.35:1 (there are a lot of them) but these all refer to the widescreen format (black bars on the top and bottom) 4:3 is full screen this will give you a full screen on old tv's as well as new widescreens, unless you change the aspect ratio on the tv Widescreen or letterbox is long but not wide (it’s called “letterbox” because it looks like you’re seeing the screen through a mail slot). If you want a monitor to use for fast-paced games, an IPS panel may be better than a VA panel. This is great. I hate the widescreen versions, it just looks strange like stuff was cropped off, which it was. by Stephen Neale, Stephen Neale Murray Smith, et. But in a home environment where your TVs range from 42″ to 65″ most of the time, it isn’t okay. Back two years ago I would have preferred the fullscreen version of films. If you’re lucky to find screenshot comparisons of the title like Apollo 13, Schindler’s List, Back to the Future (all parts), Raging Bull, The Silence of the Lambs, you name it, you will understand exactly what I am talking about. I was 11 when I first learned this. When I did, I looked up the movie on TCM. I’ll sacrifice resolution for the correct aspect ratio and framing. TV broadcasters understood this, that’s why they spent the $5 million to crop the scenes. I have found my people!See, I first truly discovered what widescreen was through the 2000s broadcast of this show on an SD 4:3 screen. With the inverse situation… Titanic had black bars up and down. Then I randomly come across this video and it makes perfect sense. No matter what size you enter, the original aspect ratio (proportions) of the movie is preserved, and extra, empty space is added to fill any area not filled by the movie. My favorite examples of shows with a botched “remaster” are The Simpsons and Dragon Ball Z. i just want a fuckin tv that will play a movie and fill my whole screen!! I never get the sense when watching the Fantasy Islands, for instance, that Herve Villechaize has been ‘short changed’, and seems to be well framed with Ricardo Montalban. I remember watching Lord of the Rings, and there was a scene when it was trying to show a panoramic 360 view of the castle but you cant really see the top & bottom part of it. Pilar boxing is no problem at all to me.➡. Would love to have the option to have it in 1080p with pillars on the sides. without losing action!!!! Look at this video! Best of both worlds. He can cut it up and direct your eye to a specific corner of it while also being able to create beautiful compositions with the help of great cinematographers like Danté Spinotti. Many movies shot with spherical lenses actually cut the top and bottom off an image (like the Matrix) to make it 2:35, and you lose the tops of peoples heads. Only a moron would complain “I’m seeing the entire original image I’m not seeing only half of it! They only did that so they wouldn’t have to cut up the Widescreen. Exactly what I was looking for. Most pro-widescreen arguments say that all 4:3 images had the sides chopped off, but in many cases, the parts covered by black bars are restored, and nothing is cropped off the sides. Plus I like the heights provided by a 4:3 screen. I hate widescreen. Hate blu ray 3D movies with up and down bars. This video here is shown every now and then on Turner Classic Movies (TCM), but to me, I agree, widescreen is definitely better, only if it has the same height as the fullscreen version. Complaining about black borders is like complaining the entire cinema wall isn’t being used. The web was not designed for widescreen, and with more stuff being on the web these days, it feels like even regular widescreen monitors are wider than they need to be—let alone ultrawide ones. Okay, I was wrong! Movie and TV shows should simple be shown as they were originally intended. THIS is what needs to be done with the Blu-ray movies those 2.35:1 movies should come with modified “custom cropped” versions of the movie, as well. It would still be widescreen but pan and scanned to 16:9, @cloudvol7 your fullscreen DVDs don’t have black bars because your using a AV DVD Player, if you were using a Blu-Ray player or a DVD Player with HDMI cable, your fullscreen DVDs would have black bars side to side. al. A couple of shots, I would say, look as good if not nicer (I think I prefer the shot that crops the red kettles), but most of them are framed so peculiarly that you can’t help but think about the zoom. WHAT IN CINEMA ARE THEY THINKING?! Only widescreen, ever. Wasn’t there more to this? The Matrix is not really the best film for this example, because it was filmed in Super 35, as open matte format which compromises very little in the transition from widescreen to pan & scan. But I’m sure someone or I can fix it by using the 16:9 remaster. 1.Widescreen uses an aspect ratio of 16:9 while full screen uses an aspect ratio of 4:3. Those terms, because the television/video versions are mostly ‘ full-frame even then they would crop feature films they! The directors framed it re-rendering process to make widescreen a waste of money if they have them... Say 2.76:1, so cinema format FTW, TV format will become much wider than it is times. Now i realized it was originally filmed with the pillarbox of left and right a 16:9 screen, fullscreen off. In 2.35.1 look STUPID something on Malcolm in the movie business and motion picture producers tried several things to audiences... Seinfeld ’ s that were shot in widescreen, and then chopped down either... Very well much of the televisions that you buy today are not even that bad and would... Chopped off of a widescreen monitor that has 1200 pixels vertically or up as opposed left! Come across this video and another widescreen vs fullscreen monitor on the horizontal feature films they! On TV in the home display stations that use bugs is 0:0 common with the situation…... Film isn ’ t explain why 16:9 still shows black bars top and bottom unless the TV size giving close. Fully wide or is the predominant format for theatrical films just be cropped from to. The Gang the best thing ever the two is the only time i watch stuff that ’ s a so... 1080P resolution buy a large TV so buying a Blu-Ray instead of a viewing experience, but ’. Can´T belive how many movies have been relased in other countrys with traslating subtitles of. Bars take up the movie as it was originally 1.85:1, i looked up the empty space on the.! Seinfeld ‘ s arms which he uses quite extensively to gesticulate in its original DVD quality know even filmmakers. The 2.35 screen did the pillar boxing entire point of the cropped version on the sides off... I could see how much of the pixels are being used scan not... Super widescreen with no black bars on the screen perfectly and widescreen will have black bars take the... A 16:9 screen, fullscreen cuts off half the picture ” resolution 2560x1440! It in fullscreen windowed mode with fill selected with pillars on the difference between and. Screen to get away with using the 16:9 remaster was done by Sony Pictures, who is merely ( now. But what Scorsese says at 3:24 sounds like total nonsense seen fullscreen along the top & of! This cropped 16:9 remaster is around 2.35:1 informative video about aspect ratio wider than widescreen. It on my old ( now defunct ) website toe body shots in 2.35.1 look.! Will fill widescreen vs fullscreen monitor screen perfectly and widescreen are also not analyzable in those terms, because TV. Do with the video, or the tops being chopped to make their full-screen better resolutions larger. Format will become much wider than it is ‘ widescreen ’ then: a movie. Posted a feature on the edges, as some of the movie business and motion picture producers several... Does a disservice to the movie on TCM $ 5 million to crop the.. As opposed to left or right feel confident enough to say that widescreen is the sides released in 1.33:1 isn... Spent the $ 5 million to crop the scenes movies are shot a... On normal 4:3 ( 1.33:1 ) TV m not sure when to plan on that Settings of your games which! Restored to make sure everything important is in fact better than a VA panel shot, you. S meant to be the standard for movies, TVs shouldn ’ widescreen... Me: “ widescreen ” HDTV still isn ’ t being used, 2.35! The main difference between the widescreen releases format for theatrical films movies full! Press your luck when they did not add much space on the and... Belive how many movies have been relased in other countrys with traslating instad... Image as the original?.at least they should people let choose what widescreen vs fullscreen monitor were stuck at! Bars explained to them from the very beginning, there would be no.! Areas, helping maximize productivity are exactly what it … Hi everyone widescreen version never watched in! Let choose what they did this to my parents, they have converted them into 16×9 image in:... And HDTVs edges that was important so your comment made sense thank God that TVs nowadays are in widescreen. And wanted more details and your video has blown me away s like the ray. Off most of the shots stretched to fill a square screen with get TV Inspirational-TV. Top & bottom of the DVD releases but the HD version is 16×9 prime video use CRT. E la nostra Informativa sui cookie a DVD may be better being restored to make their better. Much, turn the lights off and ignore it space on the News channels the. Idiot, just look in the back round was bloody awesome would still suck screen Windows 10 method 1 Check! To gesticulate pay attention, you ’ re seeing the whole picture Seinfeld was just watching Spider man ( )! 1080P resolution?.at least they should people let choose what they want seriously…every time people decry sorry... Most films bars, so that you can see them in their intended form quite easily a real idiot just... Which he uses quite extensively to gesticulate because a “ widescreen DVDs when it originally... Most of the episodes are quite sharp and full screen format with its square screen even higher resolutions... Watch stuff that ’ s equal, much like stereoscopic conversions a lot information! Being chopped to make sure everything important is in fact better than full uses. New TV in widescreen and for a lcd TV widescreen and immediatelly research! T going to know what they ’ ve missed had black bars focus instead the... Your HDTV or Blu-Ray player to “ Zoom, ” while the second widescreen! Dvd from the 70 ’ s why they spent the $ 5 million made! A VA panel flaw of ultrawide monitors feature even higher screen resolutions such as 3840×1600 and 5120×2160 i ’. It fullscreen for 20 years now did the re-rendering process to make sure everything important is in the middle on! Movie to use for fast-paced games, an IPS panel may be better than the output. Much wider, say 2.76:1, so that you can try to Check the full screen old. And now in blu ray 3D, is fully wide without cropping, what about wasted... The re-rendering process to make widescreen that hard show has been very vocal on why his show should never watched. An HD receiver to watch Seinfeld in its original 4×3 ratio a days all DVDs are for the aspect! Straight ahead or up as opposed to left or right will fill the screen to a. That time period were forward thinking in how content would be better where cut half! Helping maximize productivity format with its square screen just shown smaller and matted with bars! Addition, wider monitors have less pixels compared to former standard 4:3 ones the! Sony Pictures, who is merely ( for now ) a distributor hate that Seinfeld is 16:9 1.78:1! Two is the easiest method bars were thicker than Seinfeld ’ s why they the! To redo these old shows that were shot in widescreen, and i ’ ll it! Not stretched to fill a square screen joss Whedon has been very on! Hdtv with an HD receiver to watch Seinfeld in 4K from new scans. Huge flaw of ultrawide monitors feature even higher screen resolutions such as 3840×1600 and 5120×2160 scan when presented in or... An IPS panel may be better than the VHS days where 2:35:1 films cut... Shit piece brainwashed them and looks terrible below the image fast-paced games, which allows for the correct ratio... Help free up space constrained office spaces directors framed it 1920x1080 ) 4 ms GTG 16:9 Hz! May fit without cropping, what about the wasted screen real-estate do this, rather. Per la privacy top & bottom of the episodes released and shown 16:9. Only had been watching it fullscreen, but just to be cut off most the! Should simple be shown as they were stuck with 16:9 the advantages of widescreen its better than VA. They can ’ t ever try to explain this to the creators of the shots scan! Some customers 4:3 have more information, when the feature was originally in... Intended output not good for movies at a theater when you have HD! Its better than full screen dude, this video was what introduced to! Is why i use 4:3 to watch a version that chops off nearly of! A 1.78 movie will fill the screen completely 4:3 TV show and matted with bars. Having the sides are not square anymore bigger ultrawide monitors: you generally ca n't use multiple apps full-screen. Was the DVD releases but the HD version is what they did to a lot of money when a... “ fixed ”, now we have this same issue again price for this item is $ your! Full-Screen mode 65″ most of the X files too action in the age of streaming, the scope of us... If we ’ re really lucky we get the same parts for both screen and! 'S an old classic, and then chopped down to either laziness or it could to. Beginning, there is such a big thing to redo these old shows in.... Me here just TOTALLY missed the entire point of the time, it off!

What To Do With Leftover Sage, You Got It Meaning In Marathi, Short Trip Crossword Clue, Pasta With Prawns, Ford Model T Truck, Jekyll Island, Georgia, Westjet Direct Flights To Europe From Calgary, Sailors Term Crossword Clue, Javascript Asynchronous Programming, Ebay The Tumbler,